Cheer-worthy news: for the first time in history, an American president is showing care (to some extent) about the environment. Mr Obama announced a new environmental regulation to reduce overall carbon emissions by a whopping 30% by 2030.
Apparently, they are already a third of their way towards meeting the goal of 30% cut.
However, the amount of coal reduction that each state would need to achieve varies. EPA made a fantastic virtual interactive map of where power plants reside and the detailed analysis + breakdown of the current and targeted emissions levels. For a table of states and their proposed levels of reduction click here. States such as West Virginia would be subjected to a smaller percentage cut of less than 20% while states like Washington would be 70%. Each state’s luck depends on how energy dependent they are on coal and how ready they are for the switch.
Again, for your ease of info-digesting and for those lazy to read chunks of words such as yours truly, here are some breakdown of the pros and cons of this new regulation. FYI – For your crunching. Not to be accepted as hard facts.
- Create an energy crisis and lead to power shortages
- Inflate electricity prices
- Job losses
- Lower medical bills and fewer trips to the emergency rooms, especially for kids with asthma, the elderly and infirm.
- Environmental justice- lower-income families and communities of color are hardest-hit by climate change
- Reduce smog and soot, avoiding premature deaths from heart attacks and lung disease.
- Energy efficiency leading to lower cost, greater competitiveness.
- More jobs would be created in the deployment of clean energy usage.
- There is no regulation or cap as to the amount of CO2 that can be allowed in the atmosphere at the moment in America.
- Power plants are the largest source of pollution, contributing roughly about 40% of greenhouse gas emissions.
- 1600 power plants, 600 of which are coal-powered.
To help ease the process of transition, the kind EPA provided a few broad solutions for power companies panicking at the moment:
1) switching from coal to cleaner-burning natural gas
2) forming cap-and-trade markets
3) expanding renewables such as wind and solar power
4) encouraging customers to use less energy by moving to more efficient heating and cooling systems and appliances
Basically, no matter what you do, you have to comply with it.
Of course, the country is divided on this new law as to whether it is a boon or bane to the future. Taking into account the amount of time that Obama is giving heavily-polluting companies to wake up and respond, I would say it’s a fairly generous move. Plus, they get 10 years between 2020 and 2030 to meet that goal. In total, they have about 15 years to think about how to rectify any reckless polluting behaviours. Sweet.